


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RepRap is Alive!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chrismeyer.org/wordpress/2010/06/reprap-is-alive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chrismeyer.org/wordpress/2010/06/reprap-is-alive/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 09:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waterppk</title>
		<link>http://chrismeyer.org/wordpress/2010/06/reprap-is-alive/comment-page-1/#comment-6118</link>
		<dc:creator>Waterppk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrismeyer.org/wordpress/?p=315#comment-6118</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ll have to start looking at 4&#039;x8&#039; CNC routers, there isn&#039;t a whole lot in between but you can certainly take the design aspects from these larger machines and build your own smaller one.  One thing I would start to worry about is keeping something that large warm/consistent enough to get good performance out of the RepRap, I know currently a lot of people have trouble with several hour builds (consistent performance and no crashes/misfeeds over that time).  

I don&#039;t have plans to release anything regarding my machine, I built it from my head so there aren&#039;t any design plans/etc for it.  You could look at these style machines:

http://www.machinetoolcamp.com/

Or consider just scaling up the RepRap Mendel design:

http://reprap.org/wiki/Main_Page</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll have to start looking at 4&#8242;x8&#8242; CNC routers, there isn&#8217;t a whole lot in between but you can certainly take the design aspects from these larger machines and build your own smaller one.  One thing I would start to worry about is keeping something that large warm/consistent enough to get good performance out of the RepRap, I know currently a lot of people have trouble with several hour builds (consistent performance and no crashes/misfeeds over that time).  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have plans to release anything regarding my machine, I built it from my head so there aren&#8217;t any design plans/etc for it.  You could look at these style machines:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.machinetoolcamp.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.machinetoolcamp.com/</a></p>
<p>Or consider just scaling up the RepRap Mendel design:</p>
<p><a href="http://reprap.org/wiki/Main_Page" rel="nofollow">http://reprap.org/wiki/Main_Page</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky</title>
		<link>http://chrismeyer.org/wordpress/2010/06/reprap-is-alive/comment-page-1/#comment-6117</link>
		<dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrismeyer.org/wordpress/?p=315#comment-6117</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris,
I&#039;ve just learned about MakerBot and am very excited about the possibility of finally being able to build some of my designs.  Unfortunately I need about 18&quot; x 18&quot; x 12&quot; working area.  Are you, MakerBot, or anyone else you know of, designing or planning a larger 3D printer?

Thanks,
Sky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,<br />
I&#8217;ve just learned about MakerBot and am very excited about the possibility of finally being able to build some of my designs.  Unfortunately I need about 18&#8243; x 18&#8243; x 12&#8243; working area.  Are you, MakerBot, or anyone else you know of, designing or planning a larger 3D printer?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Sky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hackable MakerBot Parts in the Wild! Chris - MakerBot Industries</title>
		<link>http://chrismeyer.org/wordpress/2010/06/reprap-is-alive/comment-page-1/#comment-5959</link>
		<dc:creator>Hackable MakerBot Parts in the Wild! Chris - MakerBot Industries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 00:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrismeyer.org/wordpress/?p=315#comment-5959</guid>
		<description>[...] with them, including different 3D printers. Chris Meyer has done just that. He&#8217;s put together a cool mill/reprap style design that utilizes the mostly assembled electronics to control it. AWESOME! Hackable MakerBot components [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with them, including different 3D printers. Chris Meyer has done just that. He&#8217;s put together a cool mill/reprap style design that utilizes the mostly assembled electronics to control it. AWESOME! Hackable MakerBot components [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

