


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LabVIEW Shared Variable Engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chrismeyer.org/wordpress/2008/10/labview-shared-variable-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chrismeyer.org/wordpress/2008/10/labview-shared-variable-engine/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:24:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ektor</title>
		<link>http://chrismeyer.org/wordpress/2008/10/labview-shared-variable-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-1845</link>
		<dc:creator>ektor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrismeyer.org/wordpress/?p=28#comment-1845</guid>
		<description>hey, well i was reading at this great post wich helped me very much and as i read more about the SVE i found that it uses UDP instead of TCP/IP, the thing is that NI has an enhanced propietary UDP protocol, wich implements time stamping and confirmation of received packet without sacrificing speed. I found it on &quot;LabVIEW advanced programming techniques&quot;, second edition. Sorry for my poor english</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, well i was reading at this great post wich helped me very much and as i read more about the SVE i found that it uses UDP instead of TCP/IP, the thing is that NI has an enhanced propietary UDP protocol, wich implements time stamping and confirmation of received packet without sacrificing speed. I found it on &#8220;LabVIEW advanced programming techniques&#8221;, second edition. Sorry for my poor english</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waterppk</title>
		<link>http://chrismeyer.org/wordpress/2008/10/labview-shared-variable-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-1109</link>
		<dc:creator>Waterppk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrismeyer.org/wordpress/?p=28#comment-1109</guid>
		<description>You should check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://lavag.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lava Developers Forum&lt;/a&gt; and post both of your VI&#039;s and a good description of the problem.  It&#039;s hard to tell what would cause the data to stop being transmitted/received.  Have you been able to get this example (or another) working?  That would rule out physical networking problems.  If an example works then it&#039;s something in your specific VI&#039;s that you&#039;ll have to figure out.  You can also use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wireshark.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wire Shark&lt;/a&gt; to monitor your network traffic on the networking side to make sure the data is getting from one computer to another, but don&#039;t start by using this program, there are easier (outlined above) ways to test this problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should check out <a href="http://lavag.org/" rel="nofollow">Lava Developers Forum</a> and post both of your VI&#8217;s and a good description of the problem.  It&#8217;s hard to tell what would cause the data to stop being transmitted/received.  Have you been able to get this example (or another) working?  That would rule out physical networking problems.  If an example works then it&#8217;s something in your specific VI&#8217;s that you&#8217;ll have to figure out.  You can also use <a href="http://www.wireshark.org/" rel="nofollow">Wire Shark</a> to monitor your network traffic on the networking side to make sure the data is getting from one computer to another, but don&#8217;t start by using this program, there are easier (outlined above) ways to test this problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bong Chua</title>
		<link>http://chrismeyer.org/wordpress/2008/10/labview-shared-variable-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-1104</link>
		<dc:creator>Bong Chua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrismeyer.org/wordpress/?p=28#comment-1104</guid>
		<description>I am also using shared variable (network) but i suddenly experienced a zero value from the shared variable. And up to this time i cant find the solution to regain the actual data. What do you think is the problem?
Thanks a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also using shared variable (network) but i suddenly experienced a zero value from the shared variable. And up to this time i cant find the solution to regain the actual data. What do you think is the problem?<br />
Thanks a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waterppk</title>
		<link>http://chrismeyer.org/wordpress/2008/10/labview-shared-variable-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>Waterppk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 19:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrismeyer.org/wordpress/?p=28#comment-547</guid>
		<description>Absolutely correct, I think I was on cruise control when I wrote that.  LabVIEW uses TCP to confirm packet receipt, see above link in the text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely correct, I think I was on cruise control when I wrote that.  LabVIEW uses TCP to confirm packet receipt, see above link in the text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://chrismeyer.org/wordpress/2008/10/labview-shared-variable-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrismeyer.org/wordpress/?p=28#comment-318</guid>
		<description>Pretty good explanation, but as I&#039;ve been digging into the LV shared variable it seems that as of LV 8.5 it&#039;s built on the TCP/IP stack rather than UDP

see http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/4679 for details</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty good explanation, but as I&#8217;ve been digging into the LV shared variable it seems that as of LV 8.5 it&#8217;s built on the TCP/IP stack rather than UDP</p>
<p>see <a href="http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/4679" rel="nofollow">http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/4679</a> for details</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
